Tarikh : 5 November 2008
Soalan : 24
YB Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim (Seputeh) minta Menteri Perumahan Dan Kerajaan Tempatan menyatakan projek terbengkalai mengikut pecahan negeri di seluruh Malaysia. Apakah langkah yang diambil oleh Kementerian untuk menyelamatkan projek perumahan yang terbengkalai dan berapakah projek perumahan terbengkalai telah pun dipulihkan melalui campur tangan pihak Kementerian.
Jawapan:
Tuan Yang Dipertua,
Bagi tempoh 1990 sehingga Jun 2008, terdapat sejumlah 270 projek perumahan terbengkalai di Semenanjung Malaysia. Daripada jumlah tersebut, 126 projek telah disiapkan dengan Sijil Layak Menduduki, 29 projek sedang dalam pembinaan manakala 115 projek masih terbengakalai. Pecahan mengikut negeri adalah seperti berikut:
|
NEGERI |
SIAP DIPUILIHKAN |
SEDANG DALAM PEMBINAAN |
MASIH TERBENGKALAI |
JUMLAH |
| Perlis |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| Kedah |
11 |
2 |
7 |
20 |
| Pulau Pinang |
16 |
2 |
8 |
26 |
| Perak |
14 |
1 |
5 |
20 |
| Selangor |
27 |
4 |
35 |
66 |
| W.Persekutuan, KL |
12 |
3 |
3 |
18 |
| N.Sembilan |
9 |
4 |
16 |
29 |
| Melaka |
7 |
1 |
6 |
14 |
| Johor |
5 |
9 |
23 |
37 |
| Pahang |
10 |
2 |
9 |
21 |
| Terengganu |
7 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
| Kelantan |
5 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
| Jumlah |
126 |
29 |
115 |
270 |
Untuk makluman Ahli Yang Berhormat, dalam usaha-usaha pemulihan projek perumahan terbengkalai, Kementerian memainkan peranan sebagai pemudahcara/mediator dengan menyelaraskan mesyuarat, perbincangan dan rundingan bersama semua pihak yang terbabit seperti pemaju, tuan tanah, pembeli, pembiaya atau juruperunding serta agensi-agensi kerajaan seperti Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia, Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan (PBT) dan Pejabat Tanah bagi mencari kaedah pemulihan yang terbaik. Hasil pemudahcaraan Kementerian ini, sebanyak 126 projek perumahan terbengkalai telah siap dipulihkan dengan Sijil Layak Menduduki.
Kementerian PErumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan
November 2008
the answer did not mention about the plight of the house buyers and any assistance to them? The errand developers should be hunted down and held accountable.
How come so many bombed-out projects were approved in the first place? Could the project failure be detected at approval stage? Was there sufficient checks to ensure the projects can be completed? Was there an avenue of assistance for developers to seek when they ran into trouble?
It is time we encourage Build then Sell concept. For starters, the tax law can be amended to encourage this. Let the Build then Sell developers to be assessed on tax on units sold basis, rather than on percentage of completion basis. Also, exempt them from advance corporate tax (CP 204).
The developers can pay taxes after a sale is made, rather than setting aside some of the funds for taxes while the project is on-going.
Looks like Selangor has the most number of housing projects with 35 still abandoned. This is alarming considering Selangor is the most ‘developed’ state in the country. Something urgent and immediate should be done to alleviate the financial hardships of those who have booked their units in these abandoned projects. They have to service their housing loans, besides having to pay for their house rentals presently while awaiting for these abandoned houses to be restarted and completed again.
Look like the statistic tabulation is described as below:-
15 projects abandon average per year
42.6% abandoned
57.4% revived
10.7% work in progress
It all began in the issuing of the permit and license to back up the project, bank guarantee and government surety should be consistent with developer and buyer of the property therein. Unfortunately when the developer call the short all it goes is the plight of the house buyer being bombarded with many of the financial toil that suffer as a consequences of such a mistakes or uncompetitive business in sight.
I believe they should not just mere act as a middleman or mediator to negotiate for the reviving application, but should take up the surety of the completion of the projects.
It all started from the beginning the criteria have to permit the developer to start the project:
1) Background of the developer is essential for evaluation and experience versus the risk return to the scale of the projects.
2)Backup banker that are willing to support the project completion and analyze of the projected economy predicament in future that might have impact and influence to the projects wobbility and versatility envisage.
3) Government policies and surety to make sure that the developer will able to have the resources and complete the project in the worse case scenarios.
4) Protection and surety to the buyers that have took up the purchase or insurance coverage on that property bought should the project is abandon.
I believe that government is enforcing the at time completion report do the enforcement handed in timely or being sent to the site to verify and testify that such a percentages being built as a result?
What are the term and condition that has tricked the buyer into sales & purchase and later on purportedly denial of such a promise. True example: Sutramas Apartment Puchong were being promise a car park at the stage of marketing and even stated in the brochures but later on the S&P it did not stated but put the car park as separate parcel and end up the residence has to pay extra money in term of servicing the loan and car park. The answer to the changes of the agreement is that the developer has actually miscalculated the cost of the building and as a result this car park is place in that manner.
Despite many complaint even right to the very ear of Minister of Housing and Development the plight was vain.
So what would the government take into consideration should this matters as above happening even as to many housing development projects.
The last Minister of the Housing and Development head was not doing any good job therefore they have actually lost over 400 voters support within this projects issues. Down to cryonism and corruption within the projects!
Despite many complaints even right to the very ear of Minister of Housing and Development the plight was vain.
So what would the government take into consideration should this matters as above happening even as to many housing development projects.
The last Minister of the Housing and Development head was not doing any good job therefore they have actually lost over 400 voters support within this project issues. Down to very ADUN on cronyism and corruption within the projects!
Hi,
I have bought the double storey in Lestari puchong in year 2003 and it is already stop work till now almost 5 year ++, but there is not starting work since TALAM have take over by IJM, the government keep on depromises buyer, and the TALAM still can earn money. We want to know the status of house at Lestari Puchong near Sri Kembangan when can be start work !!!!!!!!
We are facing financial problem already, and we cannot stop payment at bank, so we need hand for helping us.
PLEASE………………. we really poor already since the economy go down already.
Puan Teresa Kok,
Need your great help to check the status of the developer TALAM Corporation Bhd is really IJM will take over the Lestari Puchong project of double storey link house will they resume the work.
I have bought the double storey in Lestari puchong in year 2003 and it is already stop work till now almost 5 year ++, but there is not starting work since TALAM have take over by IJM, the government keep on depromises buyer, and the TALAM still can earn money. We want to know the status of house at Lestari Puchong near Sri Kembangan when can be start work !!!!!!!!
We are facing financial problem already, and we cannot stop payment at bank, so we need hand for helping us.
PLEASE………………. we really poor already since the economy go down already.
Thnaks