Skip to content
TERESAKOK
Menu
  • About
  • Contact
Menu

High Court denies MP’s bid to transfer sedition case

Posted on Thursday, 25-06-2015Monday, 29-06-2015 by -ec-

teresa kok

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today dismissed an application by DAP vice-president Teresa Kok to have her sedition charge transferred to it from the Sessions Court.

Delivering his decision, Justice Kamardin Hashim said that he disagreed with the submissions of Kok’s counsel Sankara Nair.

Sankara had submitted that the case should be transferred for hearing in the High Court for three reasons. Firstly, he contended that the Sedition Act, 1948 pre-dated video technology, thereby rendering the charge ‘odd’.

He also argued that the High Court was more senior and that if the case were to be started at the Sessions Court, Kok would be deprived of the right of appeal to the highest court in the land.

Under present law, appeals from cases emanating in the Sessions Court can only be taken to the High Court and, thereafter, the Court of Appeal. Kok will not, however, be entitled to bring a further appeal to the Federal Court.

Kamardin, however, rejected those submissions.

“The Session Court judge is capable and has 10 years of experience,” he noted. “She can hear her case.”

He also said that he did not think Kok would be deprived of any of her rights even if her appeal terminated in the Court of Appeal since that appellate court was sufficiently competent to address all matters that arise in that case.

Speaking outside the courtroom after the decision, Kok said that she was disappointed with the outcome.

“We will file an appeal against the decision by next week,” she said.

Sankara added that he would apply for five judges to decide whether the case should be heard at the High Court.

Meanwhile, the Session Court fixed Kok’s case for mention on October 2 pending the outcome of another sedition case involving Prof Azmi Shahrom in the Federal Court.

In that case, Azmi is challenging the constitutionally of the Sedition Act, 1948. To date, no decision has been handed down by the court.

Kok was charged last year under Section 4(1)(c) of the Act for her Chinese New Year video, ‘Teresa Kok Onederful Malaysia 2014,’ which was uploaded onto YouTube.

About

Teresa Kok

About Teresa

Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is Seputeh's MP and DAP Vice-chairman. Born and bred in Kuala Lumpur, Teresa is a second-generation Malaysian of Chinese descent. n the 2008-2013 term she was Selangor Senior State Executive Councillor for Investment, Industry and Trade and State Assemblyperson for Kinrara.

Learn More

Recent Articles

  • 郭素沁呼吁反贪会调查前经济部长助理蔡镇燊的方式 应避免陷“舆论公审”
  • MACC is urged to restore public confidence and review its manner of investigating James Chai
  • Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) digesa memulihkan keyakinan awam dan menilai semula cara siasatan terhadap James Chai Jin Shern
  • Parlimen: Soalan kepada Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat berkenaan statistik perkahwinan kanak-kanak di bawah umur 18 tahun bagi 2023,2024 dan 2025
  • Parlimen: Soalan kepada Menteri Sumber Asli dan Kelestarian Alam berkenaan jumlah pendaftaran yang diterima oleh Lembaga Jurukur Tanah
  • Parlimen: Soalan kepada Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat berkenaan rumah perlindungan bagi mangsa keganasan rumah tangga
  • Ucapan Kamar Khas: Apakah Respons dan Halatuju Jawatankuasa Kerja Tanah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Terhadap Syor PAC Terhadap Pemberimilikan Tanah Kerajaan di Kuala Lumpur (2 Mac 2026)
  • Ucapan Teresa Kok (Seputeh) Dalam Perbahasan Penyata Jawatankuasa Pilihan Kesihatan: Pemantapan Dasar Pemakanan dan Intervensi Nutrisi di Malaysia Pada 25 Februari 2026
  • Kes Pecah Kereta di Taman Persekutuan Bukit Kiara
  • “Gema 1MDB: Satu Lagi Pasukan Petugas yang Ditakdirkan untuk Gagal?” (14 Feb 2026)
  • “Echoes of 1MDB: Another Task Force Destined to Fail?” (14 Feb 2026)
  • 郭素沁:嘉玛若再违庭令,将采取法律行动
  • [Media Statement] Response to Recent Remarks by Datuk Jamal Yunos
  • [Kenyataan Media] Respons terhadap Kenyataan Terkini Datuk Jamal Yunos
  • [PARLIMEN] Adakah Kementerian akan menyemak dan menghapuskan keperluan kelulusan suami bukan warganegara dalam permohonan kewarganegaraan anak-anak di bawah Perkara 15(2) Perlembagaan Persekutuan demi memastikan ibu Malaysia mempunyai hak yang sama untuk memohon kewarganegaraan bagi anak yang dilahir di luar negara.

Article Archives

© 2026 TERESAKOK | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme