Below is the response by Ilham Marzuki, General Manager of Yayasan Selangor in response to Wong Chun Wai’s article “None of Yayasan Selangor’s business” published in The Star on 12 June 2011
Dear Wong Chun Wai, The Star.
Why shouldn’t YS be given the TOL if we could manage the site in an orderly manner and generate income to fund our Education Program?
Please take a look at YS P&L for the last 10 years:-
2010-(RM5m),
2009-RM25.7m,
2008-RM127.6m,
2007-RM34.8m,
2006-(RM8.2m),
2005-(RM1.8m),
2004-(RM5m),
2003-(RM6.1m),
2002-(RM3.6m),
2001-(RM3.7m)
From 2001 to 2007 under the Chairmanship of Khir Toyo(BN), YS had continuous deficit except a surplus in 2007.
From 2008 to 2010 under the Chairmanship of YAB TS Khalid Ibrahim(PR), YS had continuous surplus except 2010. Why the fuss?
We managed our assets to generate income to fund our education agenda in spite of not receiving any grants from S’gor State to date. You called that mismanagement?
The land will never be developed with permanent structures for as long as the massive water pipes run underneath.
YS generates max income from land development. It should have been making much more than it has now if not for the “plundering” from 1991 to March 2008.This is worse than mismanagement, isn’t it Sir?
The matter has been reported to MACC and we shall see how enthusiastic they are to probe the complaint. To date investigation has not began!
The water pipes has been there for donkey years.
YS proposed to keep the site clean and safe especially the water pipes, against possible damage by anyone.
YS also intends to beautify the surroundings to attract and facilitate customers, if study by Waterworks Engineering Consultant allows the continuous conditional usage of the sites with strict conditions to ensure safety of the water pipes.
YS awaits the Consultant study and report. If the recommendations require the site to be cleared for safety and security reasons, the operators and YS must abide. This is as clear as daylight.
On the other hand if the findings allow the Nursery to continue, why not YS, a S’gor State GLC, manages it in an orderly manner.
The operators, comprising “rent-seekers/landlords” who collect rental up to RM6k/month from some sub-tenants, paid nothing to the S’gor State since Mar 2008.
The nursery is still in a sorry state, unkempt and dirty.
But the “rent-seekers/landlords” could afford expensive cars. They said business is bad. Shall we invite LHDN/Auditors to check their books, if they keep any?
Please refer to YS audited financial statement of 2010. We hide nothing. All expenses are accounted for.
All the Board Members have returned the RM5k bonuses to YS. Please let us know if this has been done before.YS hanya mahu Tolong, bukan jadi Along!
Please drop by at our office if you need more info Sir.
Written by Ilham Marzuki in response to the following:
Sunday June 12, 2011
None of Yayasan Selangor’s business
On The Beat
By Wong Chun WaiThe foundation should learn to run itself first before telling others how to run their business.
JUST think. Why should Yayasan Selangor – a state education foundation that was set up to bring needy rural students to hostels in urban areas – be given prized land in a prime location that would eventually be worth hundreds of millions of ringgit?
Have we become so politically partisan that we have refused to ask how this foundation, which has a horrible reputation for mismanagement, could possibly be able to utilise the land properly and efficiently?
There are now suspicions, rightly or wrongly, that the land currently being used by nursery operators would be passed on to crony developers once it has been acquired by the state.
Yayasan Selangor is not in the business of developing land. It cannot even run itself properly. We are now suddenly being told that the land where the nurseries are located has underground water pipes and that, for security reasons, the nursery operators have to move out.
But Yayasan Selangor will get the land. We should then be demanding to know why Yayasan Selangor would want the land with all these “dangerous” water pipes.
The fact is that these 50 nursery operators are sitting on land that is next to the over 1,300ha of land belonging to the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia which has been earmarked for redevelopment. The development in the area comes under the Greater Kuala Lumpur Strategic Development Project initiative which is under the 10th Malaysia Plan.
Of the present total land area, rubber plantations take up about 939ha (2,320 acres) while the remainder includes the nurseries and other buildings. So who can blame them if they are suspicious of the motives of the state government?
Even if we accept the argument that the state has the right to take over this land, we should be looking at the track record, or lack of it, of Yayasan Selangor.
Financial mismanagement has caused Yayasan Selangor to chalk up RM7.41mil in deficit from January till November last year.
In normal circumstances, the financial state of the foundation would have been called a scandal and there would have been a demand for a Royal Commission of Inquiry to be set up to investigate it.
But it looks like many of the Barisan Nasional state assemblymen are still not thinking, acting and functioning like aggressive opposition leaders.
Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim himself has revealed that “expenditure that is not transparent, prudent or reasonable had caused the cost of Yayasan Selangor’s 40th anniversary celebration to reach almost RM1mil”.
The audit on Yayasan Selangor was done from Nov 29 till Dec 1 last year after the Sultan of Selangor snubbed the foundation’s 40th anniversary luncheon, which was scheduled for Nov 15, over its exorbitant cost. The luncheon was subsequently called off.
First, the state government said the luncheon was billed at RM300,000 but Selangor Umno claimed that the event would have cost RM800,000. The audit report showed that the foundation actually spent RM996,472 on the overall celebration.
The luncheon may have been cancelled but Yayasan Selangor still had to pay RM387,232. The other costs included RM225,000 for copies of the Quran, RM206,040 on souvenirs and clothes, and RM178,200 on a fishing competition.
Can someone shed some light over this fishy event involving public funds?
The audit report also stated that Yayasan Selangor could recover an estimated RM148,500 from the company in charge of the luncheon, but it had yet to do so.
The fiasco, however, did not stop the Yayasan Selangor board of trustees from paying themselves bonuses of RM5,000 last year – a violation of the foundation’s memorandum.
Yayasan Selangor’s board of trustees includes Khalid, who is chairman, former state secretary Datuk Ramli Mahmud, Selangor executive councillor Dr Halimah Ali, Ilham Marzuki, Datuk Mohd Arif Ab Rahman, Sulaiman Wak and Haji Mohd Adenan Deraman.
The only saving grace is that the Mentri Besar has taken action and revealed the contents of the audit, and a former deputy general manager has been charged in court on three counts of graft involving RM45,000 in connection with the anniversary celebrations.
The nursery operators who have been toiling the land for over 22 years are now being shown a grand plan submitted by Yayasan Selangor. It supposedly involves converting the land into an expo area with plans for flower shows, 24-hour security and proper lighting.
Who are Yayasan Selangor to tell these operators how to run their nurseries when they have no experience whatsoever in this business?
And if they buy the Yayasan Selangor idea, what about the security of the water pipes claim that has been bandied about?
The story doesn’t seem to tally at all. Would the water pipes/security claims suddenly vanish?
It’s just like the pomelo farmers in Tambun, Perak, who have finally been given a 99-year land lease after having to fight their case for years.
Then there are the ornamental fish rearers in Gopeng who are still fighting for their land despite bringing in millions of ringgit for the country.
These people truly deserve our support. They have toiled on their land for decades while contributing to the nation’s economy and no one should grab the land from them.
Certainly, in Sungai Buloh, Yayasan Selangor should learn to run itself first before telling the flower growers how to run their business. It’s really none of Yayasan Selangor’s business.
I reside in Section 7 of Kota Damansara since 1998. The area, before the nursery operators moved in, was peaceful. Approximately in the year 1999 to 2000, I saw huge water pipes being laid in the spot where some operators now are doing their green business.
But the way they do the business is anything but green. Anything goes. Trees in the buffer zone between the nursery plots and the row of flats were chopped down to create space for their plants and presumably their workers. There is no proper disposal of rubbish. Quite a few practised open burning, sometimes in the afternoon. After some complainst, they do in the dead of the night. Newly-minted main Sg.Buloh-Shah Alam road was “modified” to make it more accessible to their customers. Road shoulders are splashed with cement and occupied, like they own it. Did they care? All they care about is the big bucks that roll in, and it doesn’t matter at the community’s cost. If you take a drive to the “back” of some of the plots, especially those next to the Shell station and Big Family restaurant, you see they do more than nursery business. They are into tile and commercial stones, restaurants, motor workshops, etc. Its hygience left much to be desired.
These businesses operated from approximately year 2000 to 2001. So why did Dato Wong Chun Wai and Dato Seri Chua Soi Leck said they have been working on the land for 22 years? Another question is why the previous administration who knew of the huge water pipes allowed the nursery plots to be moved here?
Has anyone interviewed the residents who live nearby as to what they think of the operators and their greed?
So many of us were fooled into thinking that only utsan editors were classic good example of bad journalism in malaysia as joked by most college students of mass comm these days….we never realised they have a cousin equally as nutty.Syabas dato