Skip to content
TERESAKOK
Menu
  • About
  • Contact
Menu

Objecting to DBKL’s building approval together with Sri Petaling residents

Posted on Monday, 11-10-2010Monday, 11-10-2010 by -ec-

Last Monday morning, I held a press conference with the residents of Sri Petaling to express our objection towards DBKL’s approval of the renovation and extension of a house into a 3 to 4-storey bungalow in the double-storey residential area.

The residents are very  concerned that the construction is illegal, and that it is unsafe since the foundation of the building is meant for 2 storeys, not 3 or 4 storeys!

The Sri Petaling residents who were very unhappy about this construction screamed at the house owner and his lawyer. The houseowner took photos of whoever came close to them. He told us that the gathering is illegal under the police act.

His lawyer produced the approval letter that he received from DBKL date 12 July 2010. This was something the residents and I had not been informed about. That’s why the house owner was unhappy that we had organised this press conference. 

He invited us to go inspect his house which is midway construction to show to us that its not meant for commercial purpose as the residents had suspected. And that it doesn’t have 14 rooms but 9 rooms.

According to his lawyer, the bungalow is meant for 4 generations of the family to stay there.

The houseowner also reminded me that he is my supporter and that he voted for me in the last election. To that, I let the houseowner know that the construction of his home is causing many complaints from the residents and I have to handle because it’s my duty as a wakil rakyat.

I also let him know know that my concern in this issue is not to target you but DBKL for approving this building in the first place. How could DBKL have approved it when there have been so much objection from the local community, which DBKL seems to have ignored and not addressed at all? The residents have organised signature campaigns, sent letters and reminder letters to DBKL without any response. That’s why the residents’ approached me and so I have to help them.

My statement to the press was that I find that there is something very wrong with the planning department of DBKL. They seem to approve whatever people apply for at whatever height or density that they like.

This includes the proposed high-rise condo in Kuchai Entrepreneur’s Park directly opposite Dynasty Garden condo which has only one exit road. DBKL has not widened the road and yet they’ve approved this high density condo in an already crowded area. For this case, I too came out to protest with the residents twice.

In Salak South, DBKL approved the extension of a shophouse onto the road reserve. This shows that there is lack of uniformity in DBKL planning and creates a lot of discomfort and inconvenience within the community. I blame this upon DBKL and I will speak up against it in parliament, and write a letter of complaint to the datuk bandar.

Since DBKL is creating such problems, maybe some of their planning officers need be removed or transferred.

4 thoughts on “Objecting to DBKL’s building approval together with Sri Petaling residents”

  1. Kitii says:
    Friday, 15-10-2010 at 13: 33.32

    Speaking of housing, i live in Arena Green, Bukit Jalil, I have no idea how can DBKL approve this building where not enough parking given to the residents there. Each unit is allocated for one car. And you can see the visitor car park is the so-called Secondary car-park for the residents, so what’s left for us is the tepi-jalan car park.

    Things started to pissed me off is when DBKL and Polis kept on kacau and saman us. At times, they came at odds hours 8:00am+ (during rush hour going to office, and some times 6:00pm+) What the heck??

    I really hope my wakil here can assist us to do something, or at least nego with tha DBKL/Polis not to kacau us during off office hours, coz there is really not enough space to park in the building, and we are not obstructing the traffic (most of us), unless we do, then the saman will make senses.

    And many times, a lot of cars that parked there, things from the cars were get stolen, tyres(seriously 4 tyres, and they left you batu to support your car) Rims, audio players, side mirrors, car batteries, wipers and so on.

    At times, we really feel helpless, there is nothing we can do, we are just normal citizen that pay taxes/bills. And this is what we get in return.

  2. kyototan says:
    Sunday, 17-10-2010 at 06: 45.58

    There is a number of project where the approval for development by DBKL are in question and one of this is the 8 new units of 3 storey ib Bukit Intan Petaling, Seri Petaling was build on the land previously used as Tangki Najis for Bukit Intan Petaling which is included as part common area of the S&P of all the purchaser in the 1985-1990. How can such common area be approve for used by the developer for their housing development? If this trend of allowing common area to be approve for housing cevelopment we might have to loss common area used for worship, playground or school.

  3. lim says:
    Sunday, 17-10-2010 at 11: 41.59

    The general rule is Rakyat and opposition MP without Duit tak Boleh buat apa di Kuala Lumpur. With Duit, the authority will help to conceal fact until it is too late to revert the situation or too difficult for all to suggest a drastic action. So what can the resident and the MP do now? Let us be frank, nothing at all! You choose the BN Government, now you have to live with it.
    In DBKL, rules are constantly being broken in the face of the rich and the tyrant. Rules and regulations appear to be drafted to protect the powerless rakyat, but in reality they are there to protect and promote the interest of the rich and powerful.
    Approval seems to be absolute but in fact it is not! The fact is in any DBKL’s approval there is a clause that stipulates that DBKL can rescind the approval if subsequent to the approval, the conditions of the approval has been violated. Using DBKL’s approval as a mean to ward off any objection is very effective as most rakyat are not familiar with Building By-law and the approval process.
    The question is, if the condition of the approval has been violated, would DBKL rescind the approval and take drastic action against the owner? I bet to say, ‘not likely!’.

  4. tsanko says:
    Monday, 18-10-2010 at 22: 09.33

    Wonderful ..thanks a lot for posting a good informitive blog

Comments are closed.

About

Teresa Kok

About Teresa

Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is Seputeh's MP and DAP Vice-chairman. Born and bred in Kuala Lumpur, Teresa is a second-generation Malaysian of Chinese descent. n the 2008-2013 term she was Selangor Senior State Executive Councillor for Investment, Industry and Trade and State Assemblyperson for Kinrara.

Learn More

Recent Articles

  • 郭素沁呼吁反贪会调查前经济部长助理蔡镇燊的方式 应避免陷“舆论公审”
  • MACC is urged to restore public confidence and review its manner of investigating James Chai
  • Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) digesa memulihkan keyakinan awam dan menilai semula cara siasatan terhadap James Chai Jin Shern
  • Parlimen: Soalan kepada Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat berkenaan statistik perkahwinan kanak-kanak di bawah umur 18 tahun bagi 2023,2024 dan 2025
  • Parlimen: Soalan kepada Menteri Sumber Asli dan Kelestarian Alam berkenaan jumlah pendaftaran yang diterima oleh Lembaga Jurukur Tanah
  • Parlimen: Soalan kepada Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat berkenaan rumah perlindungan bagi mangsa keganasan rumah tangga
  • Ucapan Kamar Khas: Apakah Respons dan Halatuju Jawatankuasa Kerja Tanah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Terhadap Syor PAC Terhadap Pemberimilikan Tanah Kerajaan di Kuala Lumpur (2 Mac 2026)
  • Ucapan Teresa Kok (Seputeh) Dalam Perbahasan Penyata Jawatankuasa Pilihan Kesihatan: Pemantapan Dasar Pemakanan dan Intervensi Nutrisi di Malaysia Pada 25 Februari 2026
  • Kes Pecah Kereta di Taman Persekutuan Bukit Kiara
  • “Gema 1MDB: Satu Lagi Pasukan Petugas yang Ditakdirkan untuk Gagal?” (14 Feb 2026)
  • “Echoes of 1MDB: Another Task Force Destined to Fail?” (14 Feb 2026)
  • 郭素沁:嘉玛若再违庭令,将采取法律行动
  • [Media Statement] Response to Recent Remarks by Datuk Jamal Yunos
  • [Kenyataan Media] Respons terhadap Kenyataan Terkini Datuk Jamal Yunos
  • [PARLIMEN] Adakah Kementerian akan menyemak dan menghapuskan keperluan kelulusan suami bukan warganegara dalam permohonan kewarganegaraan anak-anak di bawah Perkara 15(2) Perlembagaan Persekutuan demi memastikan ibu Malaysia mempunyai hak yang sama untuk memohon kewarganegaraan bagi anak yang dilahir di luar negara.

Article Archives

© 2026 TERESAKOK | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme