Skip to content
TERESAKOK
Menu
  • About
  • Contact
Menu

Sedition (Amendment) Bill ― Internet users beware! ― Syahredzan Johan

Posted on Thursday, 09-04-2015Monday, 20-04-2015 by -ec-

If the Sedition (Amendment) Bill is passed, for seditious publication by way of electronic means, a prohibition order shall require the person making or circulating the seditious publication to remove the said publication. ― File pic

KUALA LUMPUR, April 9 ― Much has been said about the Sedition (Amendment) Bill, tabled in Parliament this week. There are major concerns about many of the provisions of the Bill. But for internet users, the Bill, if passed, will severely restrict our freedoms online.

The Bill will empower the Sessions Court to make what is known as a “prohibition order” for publication which is “likely” to lead to bodily injury or damage to property, “appears” to promote feelings of ill will, hostility or hatred between races or classes of persons or “appears” to promote feeling of ill will, hostility or hatred between people on grounds of religion.

Unlike many other provisions of the Bill, it appears that the Sessions Court does have some discretion in granting the order. However, the threshold will be low as the bill uses words such as “likely” or “appears”.

For seditious publication by way of electronic means, a prohibition order shall require the person making or circulating the seditious publication to remove the said publication. So if you have uploaded a status onto your Facebook, the order will require you to delete the post. What is more worrying is that the person making or circulating the seditious publication will also be prohibited from accessing “any electronic device”. So, if you tweet something seditious and the Sessions Court issues a prohibition order against you, you will be prohibited from using a smartphone, tablet, desktop and any other electronic device.

Failure to comply would make the person liable to a fine of RM5,000.00, imprisonment of not more than three years, or both. For a continuing failure, the penalty is RM3,000.00 per day and if the person defaults in payment, he is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 1 year.

The Sedition (Amendment) Bill will also now make it an offence to ‘propagate’ seditious publication. ‘Propagation’ is not defined in the Bill; the normal meaning of the word would be to reproduce, disseminate or spread the publication. For social media users and those using smartphones, this would mean that a person would be liable if he or she shared on Facebook or Whatsapp or retweeted a seditious publication, even if he or she is not the maker of the said publication.

The penalty? A conviction will land the person in jail for at least 3 years, maximum 7 years. For the “aggravated” offence under the proposed Section 4(1A), it will be a maximum of 20 years imprisonment.

The internet does not exist in a vacuum. Laws operate online as much as they do offline. There is certainly a case for a more responsible and mature use of social media. But the Bill goes beyond that. Freedom of speech and expression has always thrived online. With these proposed amendments, these freedoms are now under severe threat.

* Syahredzan Johan is a civil liberties lawyer and reader of Malay Mail Online.

– See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/sedition-amendment-bill-internet-users-beware#sthash.jWBe7vMc.dpuf

About

Teresa Kok

About Teresa

Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is Seputeh's MP and DAP Vice-chairman. Born and bred in Kuala Lumpur, Teresa is a second-generation Malaysian of Chinese descent. n the 2008-2013 term she was Selangor Senior State Executive Councillor for Investment, Industry and Trade and State Assemblyperson for Kinrara.

Learn More

Recent Articles

  • Ucapan Kamar Khas: Masalah Pelaksanaan Akta A1730: Akta Juruukur Tanah Berlesen (Pindaan) 2024
  • Ucapan Kamar Khas: Kerajaan Diminta Membatalkan Pembinaan 17 Ribu Unit Rumah di Jalan Impian Indah, Bukit Jalil (27 Okt 2026)
  • Court Judgement YB Teresa Kok VS Datuk Dr Akmal
  • UCAPAN PERBAHASAN BELANJAWAN 2027 OLEH TERESA KOK (SEPUTEH) PADA 13 OKTOBER 2026
  • Ucapan Teresa Kok (Ahli Parlimen Seputeh) dalam Perbahasan RUU Akta Makanan 1983 (8 Oktober 2026)
  • MOTAC DIMINTA MENYATAKAN PENCAPAIAN KEMENTERIAN DALAM TAHUN MELAWAT MALAYSIA 2026
  • Ucapan Teresa Kok dalam Perbahasan “Laporan Pengurusan Pelarian di Malaysia” di Dewan Rakyat pada 5 Oktober 2026
  • Rest in Peace, Allahyarhamah Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali
  • 郭素沁促请隆市政局在武吉加里尔、大城堡及旧巴生路展开全面基础设施研究
  • KENYATAAN AKHBAR YB TERESA KOK (AHLI PARLIMEN SEPUTEH) PADA 27 OGOS 2026
  • Joint Efforts Needed: CPO KL, Mayor, and PTGWPKL Director Urged to Clamp Down on Illegal Parking Fee Collection on Kuala Lumpur State Land
  • MEDIA STATEMENT: THE TAMAN DESA PHASE 1 NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTROL SCHEME ISSUE (17 August 2026)
  • KENYATAAN MENGENAI PERSATUAN PENDUDUK TAMAN DESA FASA 1
  • 𝐉𝐊𝐏𝐓𝐆 𝐦𝐞𝐥𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐤𝐚𝐧 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐲𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐤 𝐬𝐞𝐤𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐡 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐤𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐢, 𝐒𝐊 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐮 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐚 𝐤𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐝𝐚 𝐬𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚 𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐩𝐚 𝐝𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐣𝐮𝐚𝐧 𝐊𝐏𝐌
  • 𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈 𝐏𝐄𝐌𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐔𝐍𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐀, 𝐊𝐄𝐋𝐔𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐀 𝐃𝐀𝐍 𝐌𝐀𝐒𝐘𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐊𝐀𝐓 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑦𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑘𝑎ℎ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑎𝑛 𝑃𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑡 𝐾ℎ𝑖𝑑𝑚𝑎𝑡 𝐼𝑏𝑢 𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑠 𝐵𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛 (𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒).

Article Archives

© 2026 TERESAKOK | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme